Tuesday, February 27, 2007

Unlike some of Mr. Burr's reviews and articles, I really, really enjoyed this one. Chanel is a perfume house (and a fashion house, for that matter) that really resonates with me. It has such a well-defined sense of what it is, and I think these scents capture the 'idea' of Chanel in a bottle so eloquently. And, Cuir de Russie.............

The 'niche' aspect of these limited edition fragrances is another bucket of rose petals, however. The Buddhist in me says it's wonderful - like the peal of a bell, they are transient and remind us that everything ends. But the greedy fashionista in me throws a stiletto and pouts a little, wanting to have it all, forever! Oh well, I'm sure if they're popular enough, they'll come back eventually.


Skin Deep
The Genie in Every Bottle Is Coco Chanel
By CHANDLER BURR

PARIS

AT 31, rue Cambon, near the Place de la Concorde and on the third floor above the Chanel store, there is an apartment with exquisite 17th-century Chinese wooden screens, no kitchen and no bedroom. Jacques Polge is the Chanel perfumer, and he knows the apartment well because it belonged to the woman everyone at Chanel refers to as “Mademoiselle.”

Coco Chanel slept and ate at the Ritz, but she entertained here. (Dinner was brought in by servants.) On one of Mr. Polge’s visits, while the apartment was closed and off limits to all but the most trusted insiders, he noticed the screens. That was years ago, however, and that is getting ahead of the story.

Since 1978, Mr. Polge has exercised a unique power in the industry. He alone both curates and guards the work of his two (only two) Chanel perfumer predecessors, Ernest Beaux and Henri Robert. He also invents new Chanel perfumes.

His latest project was inspired in a roundabout way by his first encounter with Chanel’s apartment.

“I was new at Chanel, and I was very surprised by this décor,” he said. He was impressed by the rich and detailed silver and gold boxes, luxurious Art Deco furniture and leather-bound books, which stood out against the apartment’s celadon walls.

“I said, ‘What’s that, and what’s this?’ ” Mr. Polge said. “I was thinking, ‘I wonder how these objects are represented in her perfumes,’ not only the ones that still existed but also those that were no longer sold.”

On Feb. 12, Mr. Polge tried to answer the questions he posed to himself at 31, rue Cambon with the release of a collection of 10 perfumes called Les Exclusifs. There will be no marketing and no ads, and the perfumes will be sold only in Chanel boutiques and at Bergdorf Goodman, in 200-milliliter spray bottles of eau de toilette, an unusually large size. Each will cost $175.

With the collection Mr. Polge restores four Chanel fragrances that had disappeared: Chanel No. 22 (from 1922), which Mr. Beaux created the year after he created No. 5. The other three Chanel perfumes are also from the ’20s: the rich leather Cuir de Russie, the green floral Gardénia and the spicy Bois des Îles.

To complement them he has created six new Chanel perfumes, almost doubling the number of post-World War II Chanels “in print.” (Among those are Coco, Coco Mademoiselle and No. 19.)

In the scent business the collection is regarded as an audacious move. “A 10-perfume collection is a huge number,” said Alain Lorenzo, the president of Parfums Givenchy France. “Perhaps they felt a single perfume wouldn’t make an impact.”

But if Mr. Lorenzo expresses surprise (“Chanel has traditionally exercised more restraint in their launches”), he adds that, correctly managed, Les Exclusifs make strategic sense.

Mr. Lorenzo said, “A lot of traditional players — like us — are worried” by mass market perfumers, “who churn things out all the time with no content and no beauty but commercial appeal for a short-term win.”

“For the high-end players who believe in luxury and scarcity and real design and a perfumery about creative fragrances that will surprise people, this could work well,” he said. “There’s an element of rarity and high end in their proposition."

Kate Greene, the vice president for marketing fine fragrances in North America at Givaudan, said that 800 new fragrances are expected to make their appearance in 2007. Yet Chanel’s collection, she said, is “great for that part of the industry in search of innovation.”

All six of Mr. Polge’s new Les Exclusifs represent ideas that fascinated him.

“What interested me intellectually,” he said of one, "was to create a chypre,” a family of fragrances, “that characterizes a certain elegance, but to challenge myself to do it without the traditional chypre oak moss.” He took a journey through the patrimony of Chanel: the places she went, the houses she lived in and the objects she loved.

And because he had been so struck by the elegance of her apartment he named his elegant modernized chypre after it: 31, rue Cambon.

Sitting in the living room there, Mr. Polge pointed to Chanel’s lacquered 17th-century Chinese wooden screens — called coromandel — which he saw so many years ago, and noted that he gave this name to another of his perfumes, an unclassifiable rich scent of tangy fruit peel, amber and, naturally, burnished wood.

Bel Respiro, his green scent, which smells of hyacinth and fresh-cut grass, was named after Chanel’s country house in Garche, just outside Paris. (She housed the composer Stravinsky there.)

And he did an iris and decided to name it 28 La Pausa after a house Chanel built on the Côte d’Azur, whose gardens were filled with irises.

Mr. Polge’s most traditional scent, his Eau de Cologne, is the only new Exclusif available in a 400-milliliter splash, at $300, and the only one not anchored in a part of Chanel’s life. “I just felt every perfumer should have an eau de cologne,” he said with a laugh.

Mr. Polge readily talks about his hope for the widest possible appreciation of Les Exclusifs. “From the moment you want to sell a thing, you do marketing.”

He added, “Even when one says one doesn’t do it, which is just another way of doing it.”

But in sales Chanel is taking a risk. According to the NPD Group, which provides market data on the fragrance business, Chanel No. 5 was second and Coco Mademoiselle sixth of the top 10 selling fragrances in 2006, with Chance in the top 20. Will the Exclusifs collection divert the Chanel customer and thus hurt the status of its market leaders?

Karen Grant, the senior beauty industry analyst at NPD, believes not. “I think it’s going to be a niche part of their business,” she said.

Les Exclusifs also represent a subtler strategic gambit: positioning. “Chanel is trying to establish the role of the perfumer taking the lead, whereas the craze on the lower end is with the celebrity perfumes,” Ms. Grant said. “It’s establishing the perfumer, making a statement."

It is Mr. Polge who selects, buys and in some cases even designs the raw materials he has put in Les Exclusifs. For the last scent he got up and led the way through the Ritz and across to 18, place Vendôme, the Chanel jewelry boutique, which opened in 1997.

Upstairs, Mr. Polge sprays it on a blotter and asks, “Do you smell jewels in my No. 18?” and the perfume does in fact have an angular construction with a crystalline character like a translucent stone.

Some figures in the perfume business noted that such collections are not new. “It’s interesting to see that Chanel with Les Exclusifs has today an approach identical to Hermès with its Hermessences,” super-high-end perfumes reserved for the brand’s own stores, said Olivier Monteil, a spokesman for Hermès.

Hermès began its line in 2004. Its seventh Hermessence is to join the collection in November.

And Ms. Grant of NPD observed, “We’ve seen a few prestige brands that have come out with wardrobes of fragrance — Marc Jacobs, Thierry Mugler’s trio of Stars — so this is not a new trend.” But, she said, “the collection is so large and the price point so exclusive, it is in harmony with Chanel.”

Ms. Greene of Givaudan noted the Armani Privé, Dior and single-note Prada collections. But she described Les Exclusifs as fundamentally different.

“This may be the way for people to appreciate perfume, the anti-commoditization, true luxury piece of perfume,” she said.

“At this instant,” she added, “I have seven blotters on my desk, things I’m smelling right now. Six are Les Exclusifs."

Sunday, February 25, 2007

Makeup gift with purchase at ULTA!

It shouldn't be hard to spend $17.50 on Ulta cosmetics - they just released a mineral makeup that I'd be interested in trying, and the eyeshadows and nailpolishes are a fun favorite of mine. Looks like it's good until March 10, so get over there or get online if this appeals to you.


Friday, February 23, 2007

Free Shipping from mark.

I've been pleased with almost all the cosmetics I've tried from mark. Made by Avon to attract a younger customer, these products tend to be affordable and fun. I love the pan-eyeshadows, although the pigmentation quality in them tends to vary. And the lip products usually have a great flavor in addition to good color and shine.


from Cosmo - 20 Backstage Makeup Trends

Wondering about what your look should be for spring? Wonder no longer. I can really get behind most of these tips - especially the minimal shimmer and more natural textures. It looks like brows are not quite as au naturel as they were this fall - back it down to just this side of bushy.

20 Backstage Makeup Trends

We totally fell for these foxy face effects at the spring shows. Bonus: insider tips from the pros on how to create them!
1. Candy-colored pouts
A fresh take on rosy lips is a cool pastel pink hue like the one used at Oscar de la Renta. Use a sheer moisturizing lipstick so the effect has just a hint of sheen. "It's sexy when you can see your natural lip texture through your lipstick, so just apply one coat," says MAC makeup artistry director Bianca Alexander. She used MAC Lipglass in Cultured, $14.

2. Face bronzer without shine
This summer, faux-sunkissed complexions shouldn't look shimmery the way they have in the past. "You want a genuine-looking tan that's not sparkly," says Alexander. She used a dark foundation instead of bronzer at the Michael Kors show. "Bases don't have glimmer, and they blend easily." Apply a formula that's four shades darker than your skin on your temples, under your cheekbones and around the perimeter of your face. Her pick: MAC Face and Body Foundation, $30.

3. Shiny silver shadow and charcoal liner
The contrast of silver and dark gray makes for an alluringly naughty effect. Makeup artist Mally Roncal used this technique at the Tracy Reese show. First she swept the shadow on lids and on the rims of the lower lash lines, then she rimmed the entire eye with the dark liner. Roncal created Mally Beauty Work 2 Work It Shadow Duo in Silver2Sensational, $28.

4. A fresh-from-a-facial complexion
Minimal makeup looks, like the ones at Calvin Klein and Stella McCartney, require perfect-looking skin. "I applied a hydrating mask to refresh the models' faces before I did their makeup," explains makeup artist Pat McGrath, global design director for P&G Cosmetics. The result: complexions that look as though they were just pampered with a posh facial. Try L'Occitane Express Radiance Mask, $38.

5. Rounded tips
If you like to sport long fingernails, start filing them into an oval shape. Curved nails complemented the feminine styles sported at Luca Luca and Reem Acra.

6. Extra-long willowy lashes
The makeup look at the Zac Posen show called for breezy, ultradark, ultralong eye fringe. Key tip: Hold the mascara wand vertically instead of horizontally so you can target the roots of each lash with the tip of the wand and apply a flawless clump-free first coat. Then slick on a thin second coat as usual, explains Alexander. A new lengthening mascara we love: Maybelline New York Intense XXL Volume and Length Microfiber Mascara, $7.95.

7. Matte nude lips
A neutral mouth is still a strong option, just not as lacquered. "Instead of using gloss, brush a skin tone-matching cover-up over your lips, then layer a little shine over it," suggests McGrath. Her picks: Max Factor Erace Secret Cover-Up, $4.75, and Bourjois Effet 3D Lip Gloss in Transparent Oniric, $15.

8. A warmer rosy flush
At the Derek Lam show, makeup pro Tom Pécheux updated the classic flush by applying a tan cream blush all over the cheek area, then layering a raspberry blush just on the apples of the models' cheeks. The bronze hue warms up the face, and the pink adds a pop of color. He used Shiseido The Makeup Color Sticks in Bronze Flush and Rouge Flush, $30 each.

9. Cherry lip stains
Bright red and fuchsia lip looks were previewed, but a well-blotted finish is key. "I pressed the color on with my fingers, which created a wash that's softer and more updated than the traditional application," says McGrath, who gave the models at Prada and Gucci this vixenish effect. Her favorite: Max Factor Colour Perfection Lipstick in Rosey, $7.30.

10. Glimmering lash lines
Give a dark, smoky eye a ray of light by lining your lower lashes with a pearlescent bronze lip gloss using an eye liner brush, like Pécheux did for the models at the Proenza Schouler show. Try Shiseido The Makeup Lip Gloss in Mocha Glaze, $20.

11. Lightly powdered skin
Glowy is in, but greasy isn't. To avoid an overly dewy look, McGrath dipped a big, fluffy brush into translucent face powder and shook it vigorously. "The residue that remains is enough to blot your nose, chin and forehead without ruining the overall glow," she explains. Her pick: Cover Girl Professional Translucent Loose Powder, $5.50.

12. Buff pedicures
A choice toenail tint: nude. For a streamlined look, use a polish that matches your skin tone ‑- this effect is especially good when you want a new pair of sandals to steal the show. We love Essie polish in Sandy Bead, $8.

13. Mega-watt mouths
To create extraplush-looking lips on the Kenneth Cole runway, makeup artist Linda Cantello used a shimmer highlighting cream strategically: "I put a little over the lip line and a dot in the center of the lower lip." Try YSL Touche Nacrée, $36.

14. Pretty peachy cheeks
At the Dolce and Gabbana and Strenesse shows, models sported peach blush swept on the apples of their cheeks and out toward their temples. The effect is potent but subtle enough for daytime. McGrath used Benefit Bluff Puff, $20, a large, round brush to dust on a powder formula (flat brushes can create a streaky finish if you're not careful). Her blush suggestion: Cover Girl CG Cheekers in Pretty Peach, $3.50.

15. Almost-bushy brows
Full, natural brows tweezed only to define the arch, not to make the ends look tapered, dominated the runways. McGrath used Dior Powder Eyebrow Pencil in Brown, $23, to fill in a model's brows, then brushed it with Paula Dorf Angle Liner Brush, $20, to blend in and spread the color.

16. Gilded lids
At Anna Sui, gold eyes sparkled against bronzed skin. To get a seamless application, dampen a small shadow brush, then stroke a Midas-touched hue like Max Factor Eye Shadow in Hollywood Gold, $4.10, on lids, creases and lower lashes, explains McGrath.

17. Blue-black eye liner
Bad-girl smudged eyes looked even more mischievous at Marc Jacobs because makeup artist Dick Page mixed a navy blue and a black cream liner together, than applied it on upper and lower lash lines. The hint of blue makes the black look even darker.

18. Opaque white nails
Spotted on catwalkers' hands and feet: a crisp white nail polish. It's the antithesis of winter's vampy raisin shades. The key to copping the effect is to apply two coats for a truly nontransparent finish. We like Chanel Nail Colour in French Manicure, $18.

19. Satin-finish stems
Glittery body lotions are taking a backseat to basic body creams. "You want skin to look soft and ladylike ‑- not like a disco ball," explains Alexander. A good new one: Jergens Ultra Healing Moisturizer, $3.79

20. Chocolate cat eyes
One of the most sultry eye looks of the season is a brown, smoky effect that extends in a triangle past the outer corners. First, pat brown shadow on your lids, then rim your upper lashes and the outer third of your lower lashes with chocolate liner, drawing the line past the outer corners, explains Alexander.

Cynthia Rowley partners with Avon

Hot on the heels of its collaboration with Jillian Dempsey, Avon has another co-branded collection coming out. I like the limited-edition designer launches like Proenza Schoeler at Target and MAC Temperley collections, for example. I look forward to seeing more about this.
WITH AN EYE TOWARD BECOMING a more fashion-forward beauty brand, Avon is partnering with popular fashion/accessories designer Cynthia Rowley for a co-branded color cosmetics collection.

The Rowley collection will be supported with a print ad campaign, which will include a spread in fashion’s monthly bible, Vogue.

The company plans to increase its media outlay this year by a significant 35%, to $340 million. Avon’s total media spend last year was $249 million, up a whopping 83% from 2005. The company’s creative is handled in-house, and the planned increase in advertising is intended to directly improve sales.

In the next month, Avon will launch a global advertising campaign, under the umbrella tag, “Hello, Tomorrow.”

Thursday, February 22, 2007

Musing about Brushes...

I'm a little confused tonight. I've noticed a strange trend in makeup packaging - the included brush. Some products, like mascara and lipgloss, have almost always included some kind of applicator, and it works just fine. But the thing is, many times, the included applicator is just chintzy and doesn't do anything to improve the performance of the product. I'm thinking about drugstore blushes. Ever notice how department store makeup almost NEVER comes with brushes - even those stupid little sponge tipped eyeshadow applicators? That's because they expect you to actually own real makeup brushes. I'm sure it doesn't hurt that these high-end lines also happen to sell high-priced brushes. Totally a coincidence.

But seriously, when I saw L'Oreal's Bare Naturale - perhaps the closest drugstore product to Bare Escentuals - I flipped. It has a brush sticking out of the lid like a crazy mohawk. You unscrew the lid, dip the brush in the pot, and brush on. Even Bare Escentuals (which I'm not crazy about, although it's great for some) is smart enough to sell you decent quality brushes with their product). L'Oreal perpetrates this crime again with the H.I.P. pigments - each small container comes with its own brush. I can't even begin to count the number of crappy drugstore blush brushes I've thrown away. These brushes add to the waste in our landfills as much as they add to the price of cosmetics (I'm sure the fancy packaging adds at least $2-3 to the product shown above, if not more). L'Oreal is not the only guilty party, either. Neutrogena and j.a.n.e. also released mineral foundations with similar built-in brushes. Beauty industry, listen up - I want simple, sturdy packaging. Keep your goofy brushes!

If you're still using them, consider this a reminder to go out and buy a nice set of brushes. Even if you can't spend much, you can still get great results from brands like Sonia Kashuk and Essence of Beauty.

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

NYX at Ulta?!


I have heard reports that NYX is starting to show up in Ulta (this was in California and New Jersey). If it shows up here, I'll be totally excited. Any intrepid south-siders care to confirm this for me?

Sunday, February 18, 2007

Should you trust your makeup?

As I wrote earlier, certain chemicals are getting a lot of attention. I'm no chemist or doctor, so I don't know if it's all much ado about nothing, or a genuine concern, but I guess in this case several adages apply if you're at all worried about things like this:

First, better to be safe than sorry. Beauty is such a fleeting quality, is it really worth putting your health at risk? In cases like the boys exposed to tea tree/lavender oil via their shower products, though

Second, less is more. I'm sure your wallet will appreciate going on a skincare or beauty diet, so perhaps if a troublesome chemical is in your routine, it may be time to re-evaluate.

Should You Trust Your Makeup?
By NATASHA SINGER

FOR decades, companies that make everything from after-shave to lip gloss have conducted safety testing on grooming products and shipped the cosmetics to stores to be sold to consumers, all with very little government involvement. And over the years, there have been few health or safety problems associated with the myriad grooming products and cosmetics on the market.

Nonetheless, momentum has been building for greater oversight of the chemicals in everyday products, with the European Union and California taking the lead in imposing new rules for monitoring what is in the perfumes, creams, nail polish and hair sprays that are sold.

The California Safe Cosmetics Act, which took effect on Jan. 1, requires cosmetics companies to tell state health authorities if a product contains any chemical on several government lists covering possible cancer-causing agents or substances that may harm the reproductive system.

State Senator Carole Migden, Democrat of San Francisco, said that such chemicals, even in trace amounts, should be removed from beauty products because they have been found to cause cancer or hormonal changes in lab animals.

“The bill mandates that manufacturers reveal potentially poisonous ingredients,” said Senator Migden, the bill’s author. “I hope that the bill will lead manufacturers to voluntarily eliminate suspect ingredients from cosmetics.”

The cosmetics industry is already taking steps to heighten self-monitoring, though representatives said the ingredients that the California law regulates pose no risk to human health when used topically in the small quantities found in some cosmetics.

Indeed, no rigorous large-scale clinical trials have been conducted that would indicate that cosmetics trigger major diseases in humans. But some small case reports published in medical journals suggest that a few substances used in cosmetics may affect hormone function in humans.

Scientists are particularly interested in a group of chemicals called phthalates — used in some nail polishes, fragrances, medical devices and shower curtains — some of which have had an effect on the reproductive systems of lab animals and can be absorbed and excreted by the human body.

Although the cosmetics industry considers the phthalates used in its products to be safe, some companies have voluntarily removed dibutyl phthalate, which California considers harmful to the reproductive system, from their nail polishes.

But some environmentalists are pressing for a deeper analysis of the possible long-term effects of exposure to these chemicals. Some have formed a group called the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics to publicize their concerns, using the Internet to highlight ingredients and manufacturers. Their efforts have raised the possibility that the cosmetics industry eventually could be subject to greater government regulation, with perhaps mandatory testing and product approval.

Diana Zuckerman, president of the National Research Center for Women and Families in Washington, said that activists are singling out cosmetics because, unlike medical devices, they are optional purchases.

“If you are looking for chemical exposures that everyone can relate to, it’s not medical devices like IV bags,” Dr. Zuckerman said. “It’s shampoos and creams that are ubiquitous, that men, women and children are using every day.”

Since 1938, when Congress gave the Food and Drug Administration limited authority over beauty products, cosmetics has been a largely self-regulating industry. Prescription and over-the-counter drugs must submit safety data to the agency before it approves them for sale to the public. But cosmetics do not need agency approval because they are defined as topical products (like moisturizer or mascara) that alter neither the structure nor the function of the skin.

Beauty manufacturers are required to ensure the safety of their cosmetics before they go on sale, but the federal agency has never defined safety, according to an agency spokeswoman. That has left it to the beauty industry to settle on a definition, with the overall standard being that products are safe for use if they do not irritate the skin when applied as directed.

By that standard, the industry has a long record of safety, with about six billion products manufactured annually worldwide, and only rare reports of problems like allergic reactions. Americans spent about $50 billion last year on cosmetics and toiletries, according to Euromonitor International, a market research firm.

But some health groups have raised questions about the possible long-term or cumulative effects of exposure to all the chemicals in everyday products. In response to their concerns, the European Union imposed new regulations on the industry in 2004, banning more than 600 chemicals from use in cosmetics. In 2005, it went further to require more package information on product shelf life and allergenic ingredients.

Later this year, the European Union will take its oversight another step, instituting a policy called the Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals (REACH), which will require companies — including cosmetics firms — that produce chemicals or use them in their products, packaging or manufacturing, to collect comprehensive data on the possible risks of the substances to human health and to the environment. The European Commission has estimated that the new law will cost the chemical industry as much as $6.7 billion over the next decade, but that it could save up to $70 billion in health costs over the next 30 years.

Part of the push for greater oversight stems from concerns about health trends, like increased reports of early puberty, asthma and allergies. Some scientists and health groups want to know if there is any connection to the aggregate exposure to chemicals.

A handful of small case studies and anecdotal reports, published in medical journals, suggest that a few ingredients used in some cosmetics could potentially have a hormonal or allergenic affect on humans.

A report published Feb. 1 in the New England Journal of Medicine described the cases of three preteenage boys who each used shampoo, hair gel or body products that contained either lavender oil or tea tree oil and who each grew breast tissue; the tissue receded after the boys stopped using the products. The researchers said their findings, though far from conclusive, suggest that repeated exposure to these oils has the potential to affect hormones.

On Feb. 2, BMJ (formerly known as the British Medical Journal) published an editorial from doctors in which they cited reports of a marked increase in allergic reactions to hair dyes. The editorial called for increased scrutiny of hair dyes.

California has done the most of any state to address the issue of chemicals in cosmetics. Legislators in a few other states have discussed similar measures.

The cosmetics industry has not been resistant to greater disclosure. It has embraced the new European regulations, and it is working with California regulators to institute the new law.

But industry representatives said their goal is increased self-regulation, not government oversight. Toward that aim, the Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association, an industry trade group, last month began to offer companies a voluntary program to make their safety data available to the F.D.A. and to report adverse reactions to the agency. They also said manufacturers would be more accountable to the guidance of an industry panel that reviews the safety of cosmetic ingredients.

At the same time, though, the industry has employed lobbyists to counter legislation and has argued that the new regulations are prompted by unsubstantiated fears rather than by hard science.

John Bailey, executive vice president for science of the cosmetics industry trade group, said that each beauty company conducts its own safety assessment of ingredients and final products. This typically includes a review of scientific literature to ensure that chemicals used in formulas don’t cause toxic reactions or cell mutations in the body; patch tests on volunteers to make sure finished products won’t irritate; and bacterial tests to make sure products won’t spoil, he said.

Dr. Bailey added that substances being singled out by regulators and environmental groups are present in such small amounts in such a limited number of cosmetics that they pose no threat to human health. He compared them to salt in cooking.

“A little salt on your peas or tomatoes can be good,” Dr. Bailey said. “But a lot of salt can have adverse health effects on your blood pressure, and too much can be fatal.”

But some say the possible cumulative effect is exactly the point.

“They test in the short term for immediate reactions to make sure the product doesn’t cause your skin to itch, get red or fall off,” said Jeanne Rizzo, executive director of the Breast Cancer Fund, a nonprofit group in San Francisco that was one of the sponsors of the new California law. “But we don’t know the long-term effect of multiple exposures to chemicals in cosmetics that can get absorbed in your skin and end up in your urine or your bloodstream.”

Antonia M. Calafat, lead researcher at the National Center for Environmental Health at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, said the body’s absorption and excretion of chemicals do not necessarily indicate an impact on human health.

“All we can say at the moment is that humans are exposed to these chemicals, but the presence of a chemical in the body does not necessarily constitute a negative effect,” said Dr. Calafat, who added, “There need to be comprehensive, well-designed studies to understand whether indeed these compounds are harmful for humans.”

The chemicals that must be reported to health officials under the California law include lead acetate, found in some hair dyes; formaldehyde, which can be used as a cosmetic preservative; and toluene, a solvent used in some nail products.

“The law only requires that a cosmetic manufacturer with a product that contains a toxicant report it,” said Kevin Reilly, deputy director of prevention services of the state’s public health program. “But it will be interesting to see whether this bill drives reformulation of products.”

NYT article on celebrity skincare and augmentation

Wow. I guess permission to have wrinkles is just another thing one gives up when embracing Hollywood's spotlight. I've never been super-confident about my looks and have always wondered how I'd feel about myself after having liposuction, a rhinoplasty, or eyelid surgery (blepharoplasty) but the popularity of these less-invasive procedures with our "beautiful people" is just unfair - give us regular people a chance to catch up a little, first. At least nobody will be wondering behind my back if I've had work done...

And Thanks to My Agent, My Skin Doctor ...
By NATASHA SINGER

THE weeks between the Golden Globe awards and the Oscars constitute a kind of Hollywood advent calendar for the doctors responsible for the care and feeding of celebrity skin.

For Dr. Ava T. Shamban, a dermatologist in Santa Monica, Calif., the countdown started five weeks ago when several dozen actors and agents, along with a few spouses and siblings, began coming in for laser procedures and facial injections, she said. And, in the days remaining before the Oscars next Sunday, two nominated actresses and one presenter are due in her office for last-minute facials or lip-plumping injections, Dr. Shamban said.

“Whoever is going to walk down that red carpet, actor, spouse, mother, sister, they all want to look like the burnished statuettes on the podium,” said Dr. Shamban, who herself became a minor celebrity after appearances on “Extreme Makeover,” “Extra,” “The Oprah Winfrey Show,” “Good Morning America” and the “Tyra Banks Show.” “They all want to look nice, smooth, glowing, untouched by woe and by time.”

This increased attention to the smallest details of the skin might be called red-carpet dermatology, a specialty spawned in response to the relentless scrutiny of celebrities by paparazzi, gossip magazines, entertainment shows, high-definition television, camera phones and Internet sites including awfulplasticsurgery, TMZ and YouTube.

Red-carpet dermatology involves scalpel-free procedures that create more temporary and potentially less detectable changes than a facelift, including Botox injections to paralyze the muscles underlying wrinkles, filler injections to pad lips and facial creases, or lasers for brown spots and broken blood vessels. These make possible the treatment of minutiae, like tiny crevices above or in the lips, about which actresses may fret more than civilians.

And red-carpet dermatology permits entertainers with augmented faces to utter stock lines like, “I only had Botox” — a little white lie that allows them to obfuscate a veritable arsenal of beauty interventions.

“Celebrities can’t afford to look like they have had something drastic done,” said Dr. Jessica P. Wu, a dermatologist in Los Angeles.

Dr. Wu said she has been working seven days a week for the last month ministering to actresses, agents and producers in her office and on movie sets, as well as making house calls. “But,” she said, “they are coming in for smaller procedures because they know that every inch of skin they show on the red carpet from head to toe is going to be picked over.”

Indeed, the increasing popularity among celebrities of less invasive procedures has turned the idea of cosmetic treatments into a kind of guessing game played with equal gusto by red-carpet commentators and couch potatoes at home. When Isaac Mizrahi reaches out, as he did last year at the Golden Globes, to squeeze the bosom of Scarlett Johansson — a wordless gesture that instantly translated as “Are those real?”— or Joan Rivers asks Sheryl Crow about the provenance of her teeth, the message conveyed is that the celebrity body has become a public document available for close reading and open to group interpretation.

“When all the smaller procedures became available, more people started to do them,” said Dr. Gary P. Lask, a clinical professor of dermatology at the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles. “Then everybody became suspect because we knew there were more things available for them to do.”

Dr. Lask, who led a course for doctors titled “Cosmetic Dermatology: The Hollywood Perspective” at the annual meeting earlier this month of the American Academy of Dermatology, added: “Celebrities are so attractive to begin with that they may have had nothing done, or it may be all lighting and camera angles, or just a new hairdo, or new makeup, or weight loss or weight gain, but it is fun to speculate.”

None of the doctors interviewed for this article would name their celebrity clients because such a disclosure could constitute a violation of doctor-patient confidentiality. But they were willing to discuss in general terms the cosmetic treatments that are particularly popular in their practices during awards season.

Dr. Wu said an actor’s grooming process might begin a month before an awards ceremony with Botox injections to the hands and armpits, treatments designed to reduce sweating.

“Botox for excess perspiration is a must-have for the red carpet, for actresses so they don’t stain their dresses and for actors who don’t want clammy handshakes,” Dr. Wu said.

She recommends that some celebrities undergo what she calls a “Botox neck lift” about two weeks before an awards show. This involves injecting the jaw line and neck to relax muscles underneath the skin, she said.

“It temporarily gives you a sharper jaw line and a longer neck, which looks good if you are wearing a strapless gown or a low-cut dress,” Dr. Wu explained. “And it’s not likely to land the actress on the cover of In Touch with a headline like: ‘Did She Have Surgery?’ ”

These kinds of scalpel-free procedures are also popular among the entourages of producers, writers and stylists, she said.

“When they accompany celebrities to an event, they have to look good, too, because they might be shown on camera, they might be in the frame,” Dr. Wu said.

Up to one week before an event, Dr. Shamban said, she administers injections of temporary fillers like Restylane, a gel made out of hyaluronic acid, to pad lips and invert crow’s-feet. This week, she said, she will also give “superamped facials” to a few awards-goers; the facials involve an acid peel or microdermabrasion to exfoliate the top layer of skin cells, followed by an application of a moisturizing serum.

“If skin is hydrated, it plumps up more and looks glowing,” Dr. Shamban said. “It should last through a whole night of partying.

The Food and Drug Administration has approved Botox Cosmetic to treat vertical frown lines between the eyebrows and Botox as a drug for underarm sweating, and Restylane to fill facial creases and folds. It is legal for doctors to administer Botox for neck wrinkles and Restylane for lip plumping, but these are considered unapproved, off-label uses of these substances.

Dr. Lask cautioned that every patient —actor, bride-to-be or mother-in-law — who has a special event on the horizon should plan at least a month ahead to give any bruising, swelling or skin irritation that might occur after a cosmetic procedure the chance to subside.

But just because some Oscar attendees have opted for the syringe instead of the scalpel doesn’t necessarily mean the interventions go undetected. Telltale signs include raised Vulcan eyebrows (ladies, you know who you are), fleshy platypus snouts (ditto), paralyzed expressionless gazes (gentlemen of celluloid, this means a few of you) and overstuffed moon pie faces (come one, come all).

As Jay Leno put it in a recent monologue: “For the first half hour, I didn’t even realize I was watching the Golden Globes. I thought it was Extreme Makeover.”

Dermatologists, too, are watching the red-carpet parade with a critical eye on the work of colleagues.

“Too much filler can eliminate the natural contours of your face,” Dr. Wu said. “You don’t want to look like you just had dental work or an allergic reaction.”

Dr. Shamban added that television viewers have visceral reactions when they see actors on the red carpet who look as if they belong in Madame Tussaud’s.

“You just watch and think: something bad happened here and the results are not good,” she said.

But if awards-show commentators and viewers are more attuned to and more critical of celebrity cosmetic transformations, it may also be chalked up to schadenfreude.

“Celebrities are so beautiful that people kind of enjoy it when they start to age,” Dr. Lask said. “They become human. It brings them back to being like the rest of us.”

In the future, we will all be beautiful...

Browsing through the latest Sephora Catalog, I realized that in many ways, the future is now. I remember growing up how impressed I was with people who had a WaterPik (which seemed to me like what astronauts would use to brush their teeth in space) and now everyone has a Sonicare or other battery-operated toothbrush. Here are a few devices on the forefront of beauty gadgetry.

I've been constantly tempted to try the Clarisonic Skincare Brush, which gets quite favorable reviews at MakeupAlley. Invented by the guy who brought us Sonicare, it is supposed to oscillate and get skin two to five times cleaner than a washcloth. After the recent pronouncement by my facialist that I suffer from dead skin buildup, it seems like a better idea every day....but still...$200 for a motorized washcloth?

Another high-tech beauty gadget is the Zeno Acne Clearing Device. There are two models, one now at $150 and the other at $185, which purports to disrupt the lifecycle of a pimple with heat. Sounds interesting, but reviews are mixed - it looks like for some folks, it works, and for others, it just doesn't. It wouldn't be such a bad idea except for the fact that the tips are designed to self-destruct like a Mission:Impossible tape recorder. I'm less tempted to try this, because I only get one or two pimples a month and the company admits that it doesn't work particularly well on cystic pimples like I have.


Lower yet on the usefulness scale is a new offering from Fusion Beauty. The AirGlow is basically an airbrush preloaded with self-tanner. Not a terrible idea (and the ray-gun like design is pretty dang cool) except that the product itself (Fusion Beauty's micro-nutrient self-tanner) gets poor reviews. Very poor reviews, indeed. Considering some self-tanners come in a pre-pressurized can at less than 1/10th the price (that's right, it's $175 with $62 refills) you'd be better off buying a real airbrush like Iwata, Badger, or Temptu and using what the pros use for airbrush tanning.

Bespoke Labs T3 Featherweight Dryer ($200) is yet another product in this vein - just read the super-jargony copy from Sephora's website.
What makes Bespoke Labs T3 different?
The Secret Ingredient: Flawless™, T3's tourmaline technology.
Flawless ™, is T3's proprietary method of harnessing the unique ionic and infrared properties of the tourmaline gemstone is the secret behind Bespoke Labs T3 tools' success among stylists and celebrities.

Experience a part of backstage action with the Special Edition Bespoke Labs T3 Featherweight dryer. Combining cutting-edge design with innovative technology, the famously light Featherweight is tailored with an exclusive pattern that makes no two identical, while boasting a unique, bejeweled handle that simultaneously serves as a secure grip.

What it does:
Through Flawless, T3's proprietary manufacturing process, genuine Tourmaline gemstones are injected into the dryer's ceramic components, enabling maximum negative ionic and far infrared heat production, which together eliminate frizz and drying time while creating sleek and shiny hair. The Featherweight is further distinguished by its new softAire™ flow management chassis, which shapes incoming air into a controlled "cone" of enriched air turbulence that directs a concentrated amount of negative ions and far infrared heat onto large sections of hair for incredibly fast, even drying, culminating in an unparalleled styling experience.

Features:
-1800-watt, yet weighs a mere 13 ounces.
-Two speed settings, plus cool shot.
-Ionized concentrator.
-Generates negative ions and far infrared heat.
-The only dryer with a true ceramic heater.
-Patented technology.
-Comprehensive, extensive warranty.

Benefits:
-At least 60 percent faster drying.
-Powerful, yet extremely lightweight.
-Leaves hair soft, smooth, and shiny and doesn't damage hair like other blow-dryers.
-Eliminates the frizzy, "blow-dried" look with negative ions add moisture and sheen and close the cuticle layer to protect hair.
I don't think it's a coincidence AT ALL that these products have almost the exact same price. No doubt some beauty-industry wonk decided that the price-point for beauty gadgetry is right around $200. Fortunately for us, Revlon offers a strikingly identical hairdryer for $29.99. The T3 dryer gets rave reviews but many reviewers noted that they returned it for the Revlon. At least all those ions haven't gone straight to their brains! My old Revlon dryer is working just fine, but if/when it ever gives up the ghost (considering I use it about 2 times a month, it's not likely to anytime soon) I'm going to consider the ionic/tourmaline model like this. By that time, though, there will probably be something even newer that blows this out of the water.



body products lotion hair products body care skin care cosmetics shea butter bath and body fragrance body oils best skin care products beauty products facial body lotion facial skin care products acne skin care mascara hair makeup products makeup eye makeup selftanner

Saturday, February 17, 2007

Open Source Skincare: DIY products that work

For a few years, I've been making many of my own skincare products and doing DIY facials/spa treatments with pleasing results. Today while contemplating an aspirin mask, I realized that what I'm doing could also be called Open Source Skincare. Dermatology research and my own trial and error show that certain products, with certain chemicals/ingredients, at certain concentrations, have predictable results.

Case in point: the aspirin mask has as its primary ingredient Salicylic Acid, which is in turn synthesized from the black willow tree's bark (salix). Paula's Choice sells 2% salicylic acid lotion, gel, and liquid. At a pH of 3 or 3.2, this chemical is an effective chemical exfoliant and prevents and treats painful cystic acne.

All skincare products are required to list the active and inactive ingredients. It's easy, then, to tell what exactly makes your favorite product effective. Many of the inactive ingredients are just there to act as carriers and preservatives for the inactive ingredients. For example, glycolic acid is an Alpha Hydroxy Acid that rapidly dissolves surface flakiness and promotes a more even skintone. Usual concentrations range from 5-10% in products for the face, but professionals use much stronger concentrations for 'peels'. There are many readily available sources of Alpha Hydroxy Acids - lemon juice, citric acid powder, and glycolic acid from websites like Skinactives.

Skinactives is actually a very illuminating website, that offers hundreds of 'actives' in popular products. (disclaimer: I have not yet ordered from this website so I can't vouch for their customer service or products - I'm merely linking to it to illustrate my point). For example, they have a chart that shows the ingredients list for many products and then has a suggested recipe for making said product. Perhaps most intriguing is the $29 Creme de la Mer kit (which retails, as you probably know, for $150). I don't even LIKE CDLM, but if you do, I think it would be worth it to try the replacement.

If I were to order today, I'd have to order:

Salicylic Acid
Resveratrol
Eyeliss (same ingredient as many well-reviewed eye creams)
Ascorbic Acid
and a base or two, like the Seakelp Bioferment, and the Canvas Base Cream.

Seems simple, doesn't it? I'm going to try it out sometime in the near future and will be sure to post more results. What product do you think you'd like to replace in your medicine cabinet?

Saturday Night beauty roundup

As I wrote earlier this week, I had a mission to check out the new Beauty Rush bodycare stuff at Victoria's Secret. I was pleased to find the entire collection at the Willow Lawn store. The lotions seemed decent - not too runny, but not super moisturizing. A pleasant surprise was the Body Double Mist, which was a light oil or silicone-base instead of the VS Secret Garden -type alcohol mists. The scents in the mists were also stronger than I'd expected. My favorite was probably Grapesicle, although Strawberry Fizz was a close second. The "Slice of Heaven" scent didn't really seem to belong in this collection of fun, fruit-scented products.

My one complaint was the lotion tubes have a slightly different mechanism to open/close - as you push one side down, the open side pops up. But unlike most tubes, you push straight down, and the other side comes straight up rather than the usual angle/pivot type opening you're used to. I like the brightly-colored packaging and the silver accents, but I resisted even at the 2/$18 sale price, hoping they'll be cheaper sometime in the future.

Also at VS I checked out the "Exotic Nectars" new line of products. I was instantly drawn to the packaging, and the body butters were FAR better than the VS Garden Body butters. There are three scents - Tahitian Vanilla Flower, Moorea Passion Fruit, and Bali Orchid. I feel these are an answer to Bath and Body Works new Tahitian-inspired line, and the scents were interesting but WAY different than what I expected to find at Victoria's Secret.

Moorean Passion Fruit had the following notes:
Top notes: kumquat, lemongrass
Middle notes: Moorean passionfruit, pomegranate, ginger flower
Low notes: fresh ginger root, bamboo
I found it to be very floral, with the ginger flower and bamboo notes predominant. I really expected a 'fruity-floral' in the vein of Escada but this had a much more "perfumey" quality and is very grown-up, floral, and not particularly my taste.

Tahitian Vanilla Flower is described as:

Top notes: sweet orange, pitahaya fruit
Middle notes: Tahitian vanilla flower, tuberose
Low notes: black coconut, santal, tonka bean

I liked this a lot, although the tuberose was (and is still, an hour later) unexpectedly predominant. The black coconut note is warm and inviting.

Bali Orchid:
Top notes: orange blossom, lemon blossom
Middle notes: night-blooming jasmine, wild orchid, peach blossom, chamomile flower
Low notes: Mediterranean honey, amber, musk

Whew! Floral and musk. A nice scent, but again, not really my scene.

Each scent comes in the following products:

Body Lotion, $16
Body Mist, $18.
Body Butter, $18.
Body Wash, $14.
Exfoliating Body Polish, $18.
Perfume Rollerball, $16.

I also rolled through Bath and Body works to troll for new items, and wasn't particularly wowed. two new aromatherapy scents (tranquil mint and mandarin lime), clearance Red Hot body wash (meh) and the new ile de Tahiti line. The tiare flower scent was quite nice, very simple floral. Fei Banana was surprising, and coconut vanilla, which was similar to the VS Tahitian Vanilla Scent described above. I almost bought a $3 body cream but resisted and went home empty-handed. As shown at right, the lotion bottles have an unusual spout, one that didn't seem particularly sturdy. The perfume bottles had an equally wonky sprayer, and two of the three were broken. Also disappointing was the ingredient list - most of the main ingredients were standard Bath and Body Works fare, not monoi oil, shea butter, or tamanu nut, as advertised.

Reviews by Proxy

As I mentioned earlier, my better half has been dutifully working his way through some men's fragrance samples, and now we're ready to share our impressions.

DKNY Be Delicious Men- The first scent R. tested, and his favorite. He really liked the green-apple topnotes but for me, this just was a painful reminder of my least favorite scent to date, DKNY Be Delicious for her. I'll admit that this is a much more pleasant and well-thought-out composition than the women's version, especially the woody basenotes. And nobody could complain that this doesn't have lasting power.


Escada Pour Homme - we actually both agreed on this one: of the four, it's the least appealing. It is surprisingly quite similar to the DKNY, but the top notes are much clearer and lighter (mostly the bergamot shines through), and it doesn't have much lasting power. I think this would be good for summer.

Sean John Unforgivable - my favorite of the batch, this had a very sexy vibe but not in a try-hard way like Cool Water, Tommy, although it does have some marine/ocean notes. I think the difference is the very well-grounded base: cashmere, sandalwood, tonka bean, and amber are a rich combination. This lingered well into the evening. R.'s second favorite, but he didn't have much to say about it.

Hanae Mori For Him - I'm very confused by Sephora's description of this fragrance. It supposedly has "50 essences harmoniously blended together" but then lists only five notes: jasmine, lemon, lavender, vanilla, and chocolate. While it is much sweeter than most men's fragrances this side of Blue Sugar, it's not nearly as heavy on the fruits and sweet accords as HM Butterfly. I didn't sense much jasmine, but the herbal lemon-lavender notes contrasted nicely with the vanillic base. I thin this also might be nicer in summer, but I felt that it lacked the 'comfort food' qualities that HM Butterfly exemplifies so well.


Thursday, February 15, 2007

New Beauty Rush bodycare from Victoria's Secret

I wasn't floored by VS new Beauty Rush lipgloss (you probably got a coupon for a free one in a magazine back in the fall) - it tasted okay, though the glosses are all nearly clear. But now, they're expanding the line into body care - four products in six scents.

The products include: Body Glimmer Wash, Body Drink Lotion, Body Double Mist, and Body Moisture Gel. Right now they're 2 for $18.

The scents sound decent enough - Grapesicle, Slice of Heaven (vanilla cake), Passion Fruit, Appletini, Grapefruit Blast, and Strawberry Fizz.

I'll be sure to check them out as soon as they appear at the Willow Lawn Victoria's Secret!

Wednesday, February 14, 2007

Barbie loves MAC - the backstory

I found this great story about the collaboration between MAC and Mattel for the new, insanely popular Barbie loves MAC collection. I have to say I agree that partnering up with a brand that's so well known by young girls is just setting them up for image issues later. Although, I didn't play with Barbie or have any money for makeup when I was a young, impressionable thing, and look how I turned out. :/
Colour cosmetics - Sorry Ken, Barbie loves MAC

SPC March 2007

By Sally Morgan

Barbie, Mattel's best-loved, famously controversial doll and Estée Lauder's MAC cosmetics have collaborated to create a new make-up line targeting adults. So how does this fit with the luxury goods market?

North Americans will be the first to buy MAC's new Barbie collection of bright sugary pinks, buttercup yellows and warm green cosmetics from 13 February this year. Europe and the rest of the world will see them in stores in March. With prices ranging from $10 for a nail polish to $20 for beauty powder, the prices would be affordable for teenage girls reliant on pocket money. Along with the packaging - the pink Barbie emblem added to MAC's trademark black - it would be easy to assume that this was precisely the market for which the line is designed. But these products are, insists MAC, most definitely aimed at 20-30 year old women.

For three years, Estée Lauder and Mattel have been negotiating the association of MAC and Barbie. As any half of a brand extension deal will attest, it's vital to get all details right. In order to entice and combine two disparate markets, the balance, focus and compatibility of the brands involved are crucial. Do it right and you effectively double your ideal customer base, in turn raising the profile and marketability of the brand. Get it wrong and you risk a humiliation such as that experienced by Burberry when it's famous plaid was adopted by chav culture, resulting in a temporary wilting of their luxury market influence. However, three years is a long time for such negotiations and these, industry sources have revealed, have been particularly tricky to finalise, with MAC being reluctant to sign off.

Image conscious

Despite the market strength and longevity of Barbie, the brand has been the centre of repeated controversy regarding negative female image. The doll has been pilloried by feminists as having a grossly disproportioned body. This in turn led to watchdog bodies vilifying her as a damaging role model for impressionable young girls. MAC's reluctance to court such negative sexist attention is understandable; to risk offending its customer base of, “professional make-up artists and fashion forward consumers… All races, All sexes, All ages”.

It's also impossible not to at least nod towards a slight unease at a seductive adult cosmetic product being based on a child's doll and the dubious messages this association could convey. As the cosmetics side of the association, MAC could be interpreted as exploiting the already fragile innocence of today's female youth.

There is obvious financial potential to the partnership of course and the combining of these two brands should weald serious clout in the marketplace. MAC was credited in Estée Lauder's last annual report for being significant in the $6.3bn parent company's 13% net make-up sales increase ($274.8m). MAC's Small Eye Shadow, Studio Fix, Lustreglass and Pro Longwear Lipcolour products alone generated $70m in revenue. The vast Barbie empire, meanwhile, generates more than $3.5bn in sales globally. And Mattel has already seen great success with its first lines aimed at adults with as much as $100m coming from sales of adult targeted clothing, mainly in the Far East.

Adult audience

Both companies insist that their new line is aimed purely at adults, and are going all out to project this view. The line, named Barbie loves MAC, will also form MAC's spring range and is to be accompanied by a limited edition MAC themed Barbie doll. But this too, manufacturers insist, is aimed at their grown-up customers.

“This is intended to be a very sophisticated make-up collection, designed for adults - not children,” said Peter Lichtenhal, general manager of MAC Cosmetics“. He stressed that their target audience is definitely not teenage, but also that it was light-hearted. “It's a collection that's fun,” he continued. “One of the things that we do is bring fashion and glamour to the make-up market.”

Former marketing manager of girls' brands at Mattel, Annabelle Kuhn, thinks the new collaboration is perfectly natural. “Barbie has always been more of a lifestyle brand for girls, way beyond being just a toy,” she said. “Barbie's core positioning and equity revolves heavily around fun, fashion, glamour and aspiration. I would say that is also the core to the cosmetics industry and the luxury goods market as a whole.”

Various Barbie products for young girls are now well established including apparel, publishing, room décor and a fragrance. And there is a whole range of collectible dolls aimed at adult consumers. Kuhn was part of the 2003 campaign that first linked top-flight fashion designers with the brand when she launched the limited edition Armani Barbie. Since then, Diane von Furstenberg, Anna Sui and Zac Posen have all dressed Barbie. These designer dolls retail for around $100 so are clearly aimed toward a grown-up market, but at the rather niche area of adult Barbie fans who want to own a special grown-up version of their childhood favourite.

The Barbie loves MAC collection is the first time Barbie has been aimed directly towards the open adult marketplace. It's also the first time Barbie has been linked to make-up in a 'Barbie comes of age' way, and by partnering MAC Barbie then appeals to perhaps the broadest cosmetic market there is.

MAC as maverick

MAC has a reputation as something of a maverick, revolutionary brand. It heralded RuPaul as an icon, redefining traditional notions of feminine beauty. And with the Viva Glam range, it has created an effective means of raising funds with which to award grants to HIV organisations. Possibly MAC is the only adult cosmetic brand capable of successfully approaching a collaboration with Barbie. While all other leading make-up houses associate their products with real Hollywood or fashion faces - Elizabeth Arden with Catherine Zeta Jones, Rimmel with Kate Moss - MAC dares to be different. Caroline Geerlings, senior vice president of global marketing for MAC said: “we pride ourselves on doing the unexpected.”

On a corporate level, the links between MAC and Barbie are strong. Richard Dickson, senior vp of marketing, media and entertainment at Mattel, has a background in cosmetics himself. He was involved, as vp of brand management and merchandising, for Estée Lauder when they acquired Gloss.com. This is an e-commerce site Dickson helped create and launch and he's helped smooth the concept of the collaboration with MAC.

Dickson, like Kuhn, is convinced that adult make-up and perhaps other adult products too are a natural direction for Barbie to take. “The core Barbie brand is distributed in many different ways,” he said. “It's the largest lifestyle brand for women. If you grew up with Barbie, the girl in 1959 is now 60-odd years old. This is a brand that's crossed generations, that has a legacy.” Executives of both companies have also expressed their surprise at the similarities in the artistic process used in the design of both Barbie and MAC products. Barbie loves MAC is all about evoking nostalgia in women; it wants to tap into memories of their innocence when dreaming of adult glamour as a child. According to Lichtenhal, “this collection is about the fun of applying make-up, and about fashion and style”.

Both sides are going all out to promote the positive elements of the Barbie brand and the fun aspect she will bring to complement the professional quality of MAC cosmetics. James Gager, senior vp and creative director of MAC worldwide steered his definition of Barbie kitsch by saying: “There's a classicism to Barbie that will never go away.” And when compared to such girly yet sophisticated brands as Pout, Stila and Benefit, the Barbie loves MAC collection appears well on trend.

Barbie's popularity is without question and, Kuhn believes, will eclipse any perceived controversy. She hails the partnership with MAC as “original and innovative”, one she compares to the collaboration of sport and music through Apple Ipod and Nike or Lambourghini cars with Versace-designed seat covers. Indeed, in the modern marketplace, brand association is steadily gaining on new product development as the ultimate goldmine of opportunity. Kuhn, who is currently brand controller of carbonates at Britvic and helped link, among others, the Pepsi brand with David Beckham, predicts that increasing numbers of big name brands will enter into associations.

She speculates that Estée Lauder's ultimate aim with Barbie might be more long-term and far reaching than just MAC. “It's brands with strong, succinct points of actual or perceived differentiation that will continue to enjoy growth,” she says. “I think the marriage of MAC and Barbie is a good example of this. MAC has a strong potential long-term concept layer while Barbie has many facets and associations. I can see a multitude of potential themes and product forms coming from this line.”

Barbie loves MAC is planned at this stage as a limited edition offer only. Head executives will not be drawn on whether they would consider an extension to the range, saying only that they expect the limited stocks to last eight to 12 weeks. But industry sources are estimating sales of between $8m and $9m in North America alone, with the majority coming from the cosmetics line.

With grown-up make-up being the one area as yet unexplored in terms of Barbie's appeal, and 'mini Barbie's boudoir' areas being installed in selected outlets, the campaign is certainly not a small one. Gager commented that this cosmetics range will be a chance for women to “revisit fantasies [from when they were young girls] when they wanted to wear make-up and never could”.

After such a long planning stage, the limited availability time of just two to three months seems very short. Of course, this could be to inspire initial interest before a longer run is given the go-ahead. And if it's cult status that is sought, then this range, even prior to launch, is already well on the way to becoming iconic. One of the limited edition MAC Barbie dolls recently sold on Ebay for $105. The retail price is just $35.

Despite announcements that a Barbie loves MAC microsite would be available now through the US MAC site, at the time of writing this was still not accessible. However, cosmetic blog sites are already debating the new collection - a month before it's even available in the states. Despite MAC's cautious approach, the new collection is now the primary focus of anticipation for everyone involved or interested in the cosmetics industry. If the market takes to the new range as enthusiastically as the online community seems to have, the end result could be more a case of MAC loves Barbie than Barbie loves MAC.

Tuesday, February 13, 2007

Cat Eyes: It's on for Fall!

Okay, so you have some time to get ready, but reviewing Fashion Week, but liquid liner cat-eyes are the 'it' look for this fall. Not so much thick, Cleopatra kohl but a thinner, more elongated line. Smudgy, smokey looks are abandoned in favor of a more modern, clean look. No spidery lashes, either.

Also - the lips were interesting. I'd call it an "off-red" - the matte red lip was present, but the shade is slightly bent either towards orange or plum. The "dead lip" also resurfaced, notably at Calvin Klein. This really isn't a look that flatters anyone, so Let's Not Go There, okay?

I guess it's kind of a "new" New Look, if you have to give it a name. The photo from Badgley Mischka sums it all up nicely.

MAC Barbie


I couldn't care less about MAC's Barbie collection, but it seems to be selling like hotcakes. So just an FYI that you had better get to the MAC store ASAP if you want a piece of the action.

Urban Decay 24/7 Liners - new shades!


After what must have been a successful year for Urban Decay, some shade extensions to the 24/7 eyeliner range. I'd definitely go for the Bourbon first, but the two silver shades also caught my eye. I'm not really one who can pull off pink or rose shades in eyeliner or shadow, unfortunately. However, Sephora shows 1999 as "plum", not the rose shade that it looks like on my screen. If so, it'd be a great match for MAC eyeshadows like Sketch and Trax.

I tried the 24/7 liners when they first came out, and for the price ($15) they are definitely a good investment. They did indeed last all day and the rich shades made my eyes 'pop'! Urban Decay is always the first place I look when I feel the need for an "out there" color, and this product defnitely satisfies.

Monday, February 12, 2007

New Toys!

I realized tonight that I've bought several new, exciting products without writing about them yet. So without further ado...I hereby confess my shopping sins.

Kiehl's Original Musk ($39). Described as "Bergamot Nectar and Orange Blossom...followed by a soft floral bouquet of Rose, Lily, Ylang-Ylang and Neroli. Finally, Original Musk Eau de Toilette dries down to a warm, sensual Oriental finish of Tonka Nut, White Patchouli and, of course, Musk." I found this at TJ Maxx and decided to splurge on a bottle to share with R. To be frank, I've used it exactly once thus far and he hasn't touched it - but he has been steadily working his way through four fragrance samples (to be reviewed very soon). I love the way it looks in my medicine cabinet, and I do love the way it smells - although it's VERY potent stuff. Half a spritz lasts 8 hours, easily.

Watkins Lemon Shea Butter hand cream ($6). I used to think Watkins was some kind of creepy, MLM-style brand like Amway (and maybe I was right) but it's now available at Target and Wal-Mart. I think this compares very favorably with one of my must-have products - L'Occitane's Shea Butter cream. It's very rich, it sinks in quickly, and it smells divine - like a delicate lemon cookie! And at about 1/3 the price, what's not to love? I hope this brand sticks around in Target for a long time.

Fresh Baked Shower Gel ($6.99) I'd heard a lot about this brand but hadn't been able to find it until it recently showed up at Sally's. As you might guess from the name, the scents are bakery-themed: Brownie, Cinnamon Bun, Key Lime Pie, and so on. I purchased Strawberry Shortcake, but sniffed them all, and found the scents to be true and strong. Brownie was almost *too* strong, and the chocolate shower gels I've gotten before have gotten a poor reception from R. The milk-bottle shaped container is cute, but I would really prefer a flip-top or disc opening. The gel is very thick - maybe too thick for some - and the scent really fills up your shower. It is not drying, but washes away clean. I've been instructed that the Key Lime Pie should be the next bottle I buy!

NYC Loose Powder ($2). I have never regularly used loose powder, but the reviews on this were just too good not to check it out. I don't regret it! I purchased Translucent, which buffs on easily with the Kabuki brush reviewed below. I can't feel it on my skin (a good thing!) and it helps keep me from getting shiny. I've found that it actually looks better on its own than over my Chanel Double Perfection Fluide, the combo of which made my skin look flaky/sallow in spots. It's at least as good as the Sonia Kashuk loose powder that I tried previously, if not better. I have also heard that it compares with MAC's blot powder, so much so that label-conscious beauty mavens are re-filling the Blot compacts with NYC. Scandalous! It seems like the package will last forever, but I would repurchase should I ever run out.

Sonia Kashuk Kabuki Brush ($19). Actually, this was on sale for $13-14 but it was worth the regular price just the same. Obviously I purchased this to apply the NYC Loose Powder, and I'm so glad that I did. Using the "tap and buff" method, one can quickly achieve a near-flawless look. It's way too big to use for buffing bronzer or blush, though. The quality is excellent - the bristles are full and very, very soft, and the lacquered handle is substantial and easy to grip. It looks like an objet d'art sitting on my vanity. I think this would also work wonderfully for those of you who love Bare Minerals and other loose mineral foundations. I'm not sure if they were clearance or just on sale, so grab one from Target while you can.

Splurge: luxe skincare services at Nesbit Salon


This past week, I experienced a range of emotional highs and lows - on Monday, I had a stressful interview, followed by several days of despair and worry because I was certain I could have done better and wouldn't get the position. This culminated in several stress-zits and 10 very bitten fingernails.

Then, several days of elation because - amazingly - I was offered the position! So, I'm moving on up to a job at City Hall, and to reward myself (and de-stress), I decided to book a facial at one of Richmond's favorite pampering places: Nesbit Salon.

Although the service was about $30 more than I'm used to paying for a facial, I have to say that I'm glad I went. Pre-service, I was able to relax and fill out a short questionnaire about my skin and my lifestyle. There was plenty of cucumber-water, as well as some healthy-ish snacks like fruit cups, granola bars, and (I think) kettle chips.

After meeting Jade, the facialist, I changed into a comfy spa robe and snuggled into the heated blankets for my 75 minutes of pampering...

First, my face was massaged with some sort of essential oil blend - I'm not quite sure if it was a 'cleansing oil' a la Shu Uemura, or just a bit of aromatherapy, but it was nice. Then, a thorough cleansing with Dermalogica's cleansing gel (as far as I know, all the products were by Dermalogica). Then a peel-type masque and a steam, while I got a lovely arm and hand massage. After removing the masque, I got a mercifully brief session of extractions (Jade was very adept and made this part as painless as possible) including several that were on my jaw and under my chin, places that I could never have reached on my own. Then, Jade applied a clay-based masque and left that to draw out impurities while I got a great shoulder and upper-back massage. After removing the second masque, I got a deeper facial massage with what seemed like the same essential oil blend from the beginning - at this point I was practically drifting in and out of consciousness, in a good way. After that, she applied toner and moisturizer including an eye treatment, and I was out the door.

After the treatment, the obligatory sales pitch was informative yet not too pushy - she recommended Dermalogica's Microfoliant powder, saying I had "dead skin buildup" (eww) and mixing this rice-powder based product with a little water into a paste would do the trick. I balked at the price, however - $46 - and thought out loud that a little baking soda would be about as effective. She didn't seem to think so, and went upstairs, leaving me to settle up and ride my bike back to my apartment only a few blocks away.

A few days after my treatment, I got two cystic pimples that I'm pretty sure were related to the essential-oil massage. It felt great at the time, but in the future I'll probably forgo it or at least ask for a massage without the oil. But other than that, my skin was glowing, even toned, and the pores on my nose never looked so clear. I'm hoping that my trusty Paula's Choice 2% will clear up the pimples, and I'm considering re-scheduling in about 8 weeks. Nesbit definitely works hard to keep up the 'high-end salon' image - all the employees looked very professional and I was treated very nicely during my stay. The pre-service treats were a nice touch, and the darkened, silent room made my treatment very relaxing.

Have you gotten a great facial or other spa treatment in Richmond? I'd love to hear about it!

Sunday, February 11, 2007

Using it Up!


Trying to clean up my bathroom this weekend, I realized I had several products that were about 3/4 empty and could be quickly dispatched with, probably in the next 7 days. I'd like to share my thoughts on them before they hit the big recycle bin in the sky and I forget about them completely.

True Blue Spa - Miraculous Monoi Oil (Bath and Body Works). I got this on sale for a lot less than the $16.00 sticker price (I'm thinking it was around $5). Unfortunately, it's discontinued, but seems to live on somewhat in the BBW new line, Ile de Tahiti. This product made me realize how great monoi is for hair and skin, especially during our recent cold spell. I liberally spritz this on my hair and shampoo out after a few hours. The sprayer doesn't work so great with the thick oil, but the scent is very tropical and uplifting, and the results are great - my scalp isn't as flaky and my flyaway ends a thing of the past. If you see some, snap it up, or try the Ile de Tahiti or another product containing monoi/coconut oil.

Suave Professionals Biobasics Shampoo - I liked this at first, but I feel that unlike the Biobasics Conditioner, this doesn't do a very great job of hydrating my hair like the Biolage that it imitates. It actually feels very clarifying/stripping. I recently purchased the Suave Professionals version of Nexxus Therappe in hopes that it will be more moisturizing. Even for the $3 price tag, I probably wouldn't buy it again.

SkinDecent Sleek Shaving Mousse, Blackberry Bliss - I tried this on a whim, and wasn't disappointed. I usually use either conditioner or shower gel to shave, and felt that this moisturized more and left my legs smoother than either of my other options. The scent was nice, too - I expected a big, fat, blackberry smell, but this was more complex, with herbal and musk notes thrown in to balance it out. The price wasn't bad, but I don't know if it's worth adding the extra step to my routine, and besides, I have a LOT of shower gel that needs to get used up. If you are already dedicated to using a shave gel or cream, DEFINITELY try this out.

SkinDecent Body Polish, Vanille Abricot - This is like a classic oil-and-sugar scrub. It's not TOO oily, but it'll definitely leave your tub/shower a bit slippery if you're not careful. If you have dry skin, you'll love this a lot. For $9, the squeeze-bottle was a good deal, although next time I'd get it in a tub because the last ounce or so wouldn't squeeze out, and I had to dig at it with my fingers to finish the rest of it.

Bath and Body Works Temptations 3-in-1, Frozen Daiquiri. An obvious knockoff of philosophy's 3-in-1's, I think these were a big hit in the shower. They make nice lather and rinse off clean, and smell nice but don't leave a lingering scent on your skin. I actually liked these better than philosophy 3-in-1's as shampoo (the philosophy left my hair a tangly, dried-out mess) but they're best as shower gel/bubble bath. I'd buy them again, except I have about 7 other bottles to finish.

The Body Shop Satsuma Shower Gel - I think I got this mini as an extra when swapping for some TBS scrubby bath gloves. This is the classic TBS smell, a sunny tangerine/orange. I like the formula and have purchased this product for years and never been disappointed. I think my all time favorite is cranberry, but satsuma and guava are wonderful, fruity scents.

Prada Shielding Balm SPF15, Tint 4 - Prada's "monodose" idea seems awfully wasteful, and this bears it out - I've probably gotten 30+ uses out of this supposedly single-use tube. That said, the product itself is very nice: super-pigmented, smooth, and deeply moisturizing. I keep it in my desk and re-apply when the mood strikes. Soon, it'll be completely empty, unless I lose the tiny tube! But, they're $38 for 5 tubes, and I can definitely stick with my Kiehl's tinted balm for that price.

Saturday, February 10, 2007

Quo Vadis, Aquolina?


Dearest Aquolina,

Seriously. You were doing so great when you came out with Pink Sugar. Everybody loved it. Too much. Sure, it was girly and super-sweet, like cotton candy on steroids, but that's its appeal. You had your finger firmly on the pulse, like a direct connection into collective subconscious of mainstream, middle class American women. We wanted sugar. Lots of it.

Why couldn't you have just rested on your laurels? Like Paris Hilton, people talk shit about your cloying nature and gourmand sensibilities, but in private, we would pull out our bottles of Pink Sugar from the bottom of the sock drawer and spritz great clouds of barbe-a-papa.

First, it was the Chocolovers. Basically, it's a watered down version of Comptoir Sud Pacifique's Amour de Cacao. Which, by the way, basically MEANS Chocolovers. Same Scent + Same Name = ripoff.

And now...this Blue Sugar nonsense. I was intrigued at first. I sought it out. The bottle is attractive, but then I realized - who would buy this? It's marketed for men (says so right on the bottle, anyway), and yet - what self-respecting XY would buy this for himself, with sugar in the name? Would a lovey-dovey partner buy it to match her Pink Sugar? I don't get it. And the juice - let's face it - is a knockoff of Thierry Mugler's Angel for men (A*Men). It took me a while to figure that out, but once I did, I was really confused. With all the woods and spice notes, this could have been called Brown Sugar and released for women.

So please. Let's consider this an intervention. You have two options: keep making silly, half-assed knockoffs of decent perfumes, or you can go back to what got you here in the first place: The Cotton Candy. Kind of like a tan, redhead/brunette Jessica Simpson, this new look just isn't working, and really, it's kind of frightening and sad. So hit up a bakery (I hear they have lots of those in Europe), a candy store, and get to work.

Exciting News!

I've just been tapped as the new beauty columnist for Richmond.com. It's a pretty sweet gig, considering that it involves all the things I do anyway, for fun (lurking around drugstores, trying out products, and giving my honest opinions). The new column should be up around the first of March, and I hope you'll all go check it out. I tried out a wide range of products this month, mostly in the theme of "new skin for the old ceremony", IE, things that are not necessarily new ideas but come in new formats (liquid/loose powder/stick eyeshadow vs. the classic pan-form shadow, for example). I'm not going to spoil any surprises, so you'll just have to go there to get the down and dirty. Oh, and if you EVER want a product reviewed (for now, I'm sticking to things one can find locally, at stores like Walgreens, CVS, Target, Ulta, and etc), holla back, because giving me free reign in a Walgreens is like giving a diabetic free reign in For The Love of Chocolate! It's downright dangerous.

My new addiction!

this, I guess, is a kind of meta-addiction because it doesn't cost money per se, but it helps me track all the things I want to spend money on. This is StyleFeeder.



It's an easy-to-use firefox plugin that lets you bookmark and share what you've been shopping for. Right now, it looks like the majority of users are gadget-freaks and 14 year olds (or 14 year old gadget freaks), but it's attractive an an easy way to keep track of things you want to check out or recommend to friends. I'll be incorporating it into my sidebar sometime very soon, so you can all keep track of what's captured my attention lately. If you do sign up and start using it, be sure to add me (epheme) as a friend. There aren't too many beauty junkies on there, and I love to see what my readers are into.

Friday, February 02, 2007

New Beauty Brand: Jemma Kidd

Fashion model turned makeup artist Jemma Kidd has some interesting offerings in her line (launched in 2006). It's about what you'd expect - nothing too fashion-forward, but some flattering shades and girly products like glitter liner. It definitely has a British feel to it. In fact, I'd go so far as to say it's the British version of Cat Cosmetics, albeit with a Neiman-Marcus price to match.

The Walk in Beauty palette, $45, is filled with, well, nothing too exciting:
• Shimmer Dust in Fire Frost.
• Metallic eye-shadow in Illumination.
• Wet/dry powder in Shimmering Black.
• Hi Shine lip gloss in Rose Gold
• Cheek brush.
• Ultimate eye brush.
Best bets look like the Blush duos - we've seen the peachy-pink blush paired with a neutral bronzer before but the addition of a creme option as well as the expected powder blush/bronzer is a nice touch. At $32 for the creme version and $38 for the powder, it's not any more expensive than the NARS version.

At $37, I'd stay away from the sheer cheek and lip tint, for the sole reason that there are many similar products available at a much better price. It looks to be a very similar shade to Benetint, but a much smaller amount in the bottle for $10 more. Ditto the glitter liners, which Urban Decay, MAC, and others do much better (and in much more interesting shades).

In short, more power to women who work in the industries beauty is peripherally associated with (fashion, showbiz, etc) who then parlay their experience into an entrepreneurial endeavor. But this particular showing isn't very exciting or affordable, and Jemma Kidd just doesn't have the name recognition in the U.S. to carry the brand on personality alone (I had to look her up on wikipedia to make sure I knew who she was).

Pretty Young Things from Bobbi Brown


The right shade of violet is an unexpected trick to perk up a variety of skintones. Darker skins can pull off highly saturated, ultra-intense shades, while fair and medium skintones can also benefit from a peppy pop of color. Picking the right tone for your skin isn't easy, though. Bobbi Brown has made this a little easier, with a palette of mid-range, neutral violets. Three eyeshadows, three lipglosses, and a blush for $50 isn't a bad deal, and her packaging is substantial and classy as always. I've been pleased with Bobbi's lipglosses in the past, because they offer a smooth formula that's comparatively packed with pigment. According to Neiman Marcus:
Inspired by the wild flowers Bobbi Brown saw while traveling out west, this Violet Face Palette contains fresh, pretty, and vibrant shades.

This limited-edition palette includes:
• Three eye shadows in Ivory, Orchid Shimmer Wash, and Mahogany.
• One blush in Baby Violet.
• Three lip glosses in Golden Beige Shimmer, Pink Lily, and Golden Violet Shimmer.

Mascara Mayhem!!!

or, "Don't Believe the Hype". Crazy makeup claims are nothing new (foundations have been purported to 'match your skintype' for many years now), but with technology and chemistry advancing further each day, the claims are getting even more incredible! I am sometimes downright embarassed by the psuedo-science trotted out in the name of high-tech beauty. Case in point - four new mascaras from Sephora:

1. Fusion Beauty's Lash Fusion ($39) purports to plump lashes for an extended period of time. I'll highlight the neo-beauty buzzwords.

Sephora says-
LashFusion™ is an all-in-one Lash Plump treatment mascara.

What it is formulated to do:
Fusion's Micro-Technology™ delivery system allows for tiny particles of our encapsulated, multitasking Lash Plump formula to strengthen and protect each and every last lash through a time-release mechanism. In addition, LashFusion is formulated with micro fibers to increase lash length and volume and deep rich pigments for glossy, high impact lashes.

What else you need to know:
LashFusion is formulated with hydrolyzed keratin (keratin that reacts with water) which bio-adheres (clings to and charges the lashes) to keep them long and luscious through a nanosphere (particles even smaller than microspheres) time-release formula. Natural camellia oil and panthenol (vitamin B5) work to condition lashes, enhance their appearance, and increase elasticity. The fiber-rich wand extends lashes and makes them silky smooth. Weather-, water-, and smudge-resistant.


I say - Mascara is mascara. It's basically black pigment in suspension with emollients and other chemicals. If you see a picture of yourself wearing no mascara, and then a picture of yourself wearing ANY mascara, the difference is huge. Now, if the difference was between, say, Maybelline Great Lash, and this (or your favorite mascara).

Hype Factor (out of 10): 8. 5 points straightaway for mentioning nanospheres. Two points for the incredulous phrase "bio-adheres". Okay, I took basic chemistry, and there was no mention of bio-adhesion anywhere, just your garden variety static electricity, gravity, ionic and covalent bonds, keeping things happily stuck one to another. One point for microfibers (which do make a notable difference, but perhaps not one that you'd prefer, and which are also prone to getting in one's eye and hurting like the dickens (ask me how I know...). Oh, and did I mention it's FORTY BUCKS? The only good things I can see about this mascara is that it's smudge/water resistant and comes in brown or black.

2. Imju Fiberwig Mascara ($22). What it is:
A mascara that goes beyond the norm; it's like paint-on false eyelashes.

What it is formulated to do:
Fiberwig magically forms a film-coating on each lash with fibers that keep tears, sweat, and oils at bay for perfect, clump-free, smudge-proof lashes every time.

I say: Supposedly, this brand is Big In Japan, but then again, aren't we all? Anyway, it wins kooky points for the name, which sounds like some sort of bug. Do you really want your mascara to "go beyond the norm", though? I really don't mind normal mascara or eyelashes.

Hype Factor (out of 10): 5. Again, it's not magic, it's basic chemistry. You put it on, it transfers from the brush to your lashes and stays there for a while, until you take it off. What's magical about that? Similar to the cult favorite "Kiss Me" mascara by blinc, this forms little tubes around your lashes that wash off. And who wants "paint-on false eyelashes"? How about some real false eyelashes? I'm ambivalent about the price, but it seems downright cheap compared to the last mascara.

What it is:
Super-volumizing and lengthening mascara.

What it is formulated to do:
This exclusive, 3D formula actually builds tubes around each lash. This " Lash Injection " has unique elastic polymers that curl, fatten, and stretch far beyond the natural lash. This adds extreme volume, curl and length for that costly lash extension look without any of the hassle, pain or commitment. You will no longer see clumps and lumps - but long, gorgeous, fluttering, new and improved eyelashes.

What else you need to know:
With a flick of the specially-designed "GIANT" wand lashes will be injected with indelible, weather-proof color. Substantial percentages of jojoba and vitamin E deeply condition lashes to prevent breakage and damage that can result in broken or sparse lashes. Easily removable with soap and warm water or eye make-up remover, this amazing mascara doesn't dissolve and smudge like any ordinary mascara. Lash Injection comes off in tiny tubes, like little lash socks!
I say - aside from the dreadful name (who really wants an injection into her lashes), this product description is much more down to earth. I'm still not convinced that dry lashes contribute to breakage - it's more likely that vigorous scrubbing to get the mascara off is the culprit. Again, another 'tube forming' formula (is this the wave of the future)?

Hype factor: 3. At least they use real words, like polymer. But, can someone please explain to me what a 3-D formula is? Last time I checked, all the makeup in my traincase exists in not one, not two, but all three dimensions. But this mascara succumbs to a fate that many, many products seem to these days - trying to replace an actual beauty procedure. In this case it's lash extensions. If I really felt I needed lash extensions, I'd get lash extensions. All I want is something to emphasize and darken them.

4. LORAC Publicity Stunt Lashes Long-Wearing Mascara ($18.50).
What it is:
Long wearing mascara.

What it is formulated to do:
LORAC's new breakthrough mascara pulls a publicity stunt … unbelievably gorgeous lashes that last! This revolutionary mascara creates long, lush lashes that are gym-proof, cry-proof and red carpet beauty-proof!

What else you need to know:
Its ultra lightweight formula is loaded with natural ingredients that create a long wearing, innovative new technology, allowing you to take a break from re-applying your mascara every day without it smudging, budging, or flaking. Get the celebrities' red carpet secret to flawless, long luxurious lashes that last and last!
I say - the claims are pretty down-to earth. Basically, it's supposed to last a long time and not smudge. I guess the 'active ingredient', Volcanic Ash, is the "natural ingredient" that is referred to. I remember a few years ago when Revlon came out with that 3-day mascara, and the reviews weren't all that great. I'm guessing that this is the same idea. Really, though, who is SO BUSY that they can't wash their face and reapply mascara every day?

Hype Factor: 2. I'd like more info about how, exactly, volcanic ash makes this such an innovative product. But other than that, the hype is pretty minimal. If I were to try any of these products, I'd try this one. Wow, and look at that - the products with the highest price had the loftiest claims. You don't think their respective companies just felt the need to make up some crazy claims to support the astronomical price-points, do you? Naah.

Final Thoughts: I'm still unconvinced that I need any of these new-fangled mascaras. The names make me even more sure that I don't WANT some of them. I've never been an advocate of spending $$$ on mascara, since it breeds bacteria and is supposed to be replaced so often. I'm sticking with my trusty Maybelline Full & Soft until further notice

Thursday, February 01, 2007

Modern Atelier - The First Year!

So, just recently I realized that the beginning of February is the Modern Atelier 1 year anniversary! First and foremost I'd like to thank everyone who visited my Etsy store, visited my blog, or visited me at the Farmer's Market - especially those of you who purchased one of my scents. In the spirit of growing and learning, I'd like to share some of the things I've learned, and some of my goals for the future.

First, Some Lessons:

1. Like they always say, any press is good press. I was lucky to get several writeups this year, in Richmond Magazine, on Richmond.com, and other blogs and a rather bizarre radio experience. No small wonder, that June (the month most of the press happened to occur) was my best month, sales-wise. I'm glad that folks "get" my Richmond-inspired scents. Even after Mac Watson and his listeners said Richmond smelled like a "doo-doo factory" or race car fuel (nevermind that RIR is in Henrico County, not the city), I got many supportive e-mails and feedback. Scent resonates with (some) people. I think the highest honor came from a bride who was getting married at Maymont, who purchased her bridal party Maymont perfume as a gift.

2. Give the people what they want. I started this business all about being flexible and creative. One of my new men's scents, Topaz, is a blend of rich pipe tobacco and sweet yuzu. It came about through a collaboration with a creative customer. I've also been more than happy to take pre-orders from customers who want a particular scent that I don't have in my arsenal, but have access to. It may take about a week longer than the average transaction, but the buyer gets exactly what he or she wants, and I get to add a new scent to my library that I might not otherwise have considered.

3. You can NEVER be too organized.
I'm not one of those "Born Organized" folks, but I do okay with keeping track of most things. I learned how important keeping an inventory is for a business! Now, I'm almost guaranteed not to order an extra of something I already had, or to run out of something I need.




Goals:

Per #1 above, I realized that I can't just luck into everything. I've got a plan to send out PR packages to local media, and there's a chance (large or small, I don't know yet) that I'll be featured in a national magazine sometime this spring. I'll keep you posted.

As for #3, my goal now is to pare down to just the essentials. There's a theory about running a business similar to mine that you can never have too many scents. If someone has a scent in mind, and you don't carry it, you've lost a sale. In some ways, I guess this is true. But my niche is the Richmond-inspired scents. Do I want to pare down to just these scents? I know some customers have a hard time picking out what they want, and a smaller set of choices might help. What do you think?

Better pictures. A good friend managed to take some nice pix of my product during a beautiful summer afternoon. I've been relying on said pix for many months now. I wonder if other pictures might give my store some variety?